Leveraging Design and Access Statements for LBA: A Case Study On St James’ House

Introduction:

Case Study: This statement delves into the intricacies of a proposed conversion project for 9 St James’s Street, Dover, emphasising the significance of design and access statements in navigating the complexities of listed building applications. The statement elucidates the proposal’s adherence to heritage preservation, urban planning principles, and policy frameworks.

Importance: The introduction sets the context for the case study, providing a brief overview of the project’s objectives and scope. It helps orient readers to the topic and establishes the relevance of design and access statements in listed building applications. If you’re writing your own statement, it is advised that you set out exactly what you want to achieve, to ensure clarity.

Process:

Case Study: The iterative design process of the proposal is outlined, highlighting its responsiveness to site constraints, historical context, and policy guidelines. This section underscores the comprehensive approach adopted to address various aspects, including heritage preservation, flood risk mitigation, residential amenity, and highway considerations.

Importance: Detailing the design process underscores the thoroughness and diligence applied in developing the proposal. It highlights the iterative nature of design decisions, demonstrating responsiveness to site constraints, historical context, and regulatory requirements.

Site and Location:

Case Study: A detailed overview of the site’s historical significance, architectural features, and urban context is provided. The narrative underscores the building’s heritage value as a Grade 2 listed structure within the Dover Castle Conservation Area, necessitating sensitive design interventions.

Importance: Understanding the site’s historical significance, architectural features, and urban context is crucial for informed decision-making. This section provides essential background information, enabling stakeholders to appreciate the heritage value and contextual factors influencing the proposed development.

Details of the Proposal and Justification:

Case Study: The proposed conversion to a single dwelling and associated internal alterations are meticulously justified, emphasising the restoration of original features and the compatibility with heritage preservation objectives. The rationale for repurposing the building to meet contemporary housing demands is elucidated, considering its historical significance and market dynamics.

Importance: This section articulates the specifics of the proposed conversion project and the rationale behind design choices. By explaining the proposed alterations and their alignment with heritage preservation objectives, it seeks to justify the project’s viability and suitability within the listed building context.

Material Considerations:

Case Study: A thorough analysis of policy frameworks, including the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and local development strategies, is presented. The proposal’s alignment with key planning principles, such as high-quality design, heritage conservation, and sustainable development, is underscored to substantiate its compliance with regulatory requirements.

Importance: Policy frameworks shape the regulatory environment within which development proposals must comply. Analysing these frameworks, such as the NPPF and local planning policies, helps stakeholders understand the legal and policy context governing the project and assess its compliance with relevant regulations.

Impact on Heritage Assets:

Case Study: The proposal’s impact on designated heritage assets, including the listed building and conservation area, is assessed. Through meticulous design interventions, the project aims to enhance the architectural character of the building and its surroundings while preserving historical significance.

Importance: Listed buildings and conservation areas are protected for their cultural and historical significance. Evaluating the proposal’s impact on these heritage assets is essential to ensure that development activities do not compromise their integrity. This section assesses the proposed changes in light of heritage conservation principles and regulatory requirements.

Conclusion:

Case Study: The conclusion emphasises the project’s alignment with policy objectives, preservation of architectural heritage, and contribution to sustainable development goals. It advocates for the approval of the planning and listed building applications, citing their potential to deliver substantial benefits without compromising heritage integrity.

Importance: The conclusion synthesises key findings and arguments presented throughout the case study, reaffirming the project’s alignment with policy objectives and heritage preservation goals. It serves as a call to action, advocating for the approval of the proposed development based on its merits and benefits to the community.